Yellowface by R.F. Kuang

The true genius of Yellowface by R.F. Kuang is that you will come away with no answers in the debate over who can author non-white characters. The novel opens with June (a white woman) and Athena (a Chinese-American woman). They both went to Yale and studied creative writing, but while Athena’s career has taken off, June is stuck. Athena has best-selling “litfic” and movie deals in the work while June published a highly autobiographical novel that sold to a press that was shortly thereafter shuttered. Although they aren’t really close or friendly, June and Athena hang out like friends. In the opening chapter, the two are hanging out at a fancy restaurant, drinking cocktails that Athena pays for, and get tipsy. They head to Athena’s apartment, where June has never been. She’s jealous of Athena’s life, but alcohol is the great softener that makes both women silly. They engage in a pancake eating contest. And then, “Athena Liu, twenty-seven, female, is dead because she choked, to death, on a fucking pancake.” Shortly before, Athena had shown June her newest manuscript, laboriously written on a typewriter because Athena doesn’t believe computers are conducive to her process. As emergency services cart Athena’s body away, June dumps the manuscript that no one knows exists, into her bag.

From there, author Kuang takes readers on a harrowing ride because the novel is in first-person point of view: June’s. Much like Lolita‘s Humbert Humbert, June is convincing regardless of how moral her decisions. She can convince herself (and readers) of just about anything, such as how much she researched and reworked Athena’s draft, making the novel basically June’s. When she gets a book deal, June is labeled the next hottest young writer. But publishing isn’t just printing books; it’s also what happens on social media. Other Asian-American writers attack June for how her book is marketed. Although she goes by June Hayward, the publisher rebrands her as Juniper Song, which is technically June’s legal first and middle name, but the ambiguous author photos in which she looks tanner, and the reader’s assumption that her last name is Song, suggests they’re trying to quell anyone shouting about #OwnVoices.

Asian authors, critics, and artists pile on Twitter, accusing June of plagiarism and appropriation. While she has plagiarized, June’s narrative convinces you she’s the victim of bullying here. Is she? It’s hard to tell when you live in her head. On top of that, the book she stole is about Chinese Laborers during WWI. Kuang makes the conversation murky when she adds that Athena was a thief in her own right. When June meets Athena’s mother — Athena’s only family — the mother reveals that she didn’t often read Athena’s books: “She drew so much from her childhood, from stories her father and I told her, from things . . . things in our past. Our family’s past. I did read her first novel, and that’s when I realized it’s very hard to read about these memories from someone else’s point of view.” Kuang brilliantly gives readers no easy answers and she proceeds to give other examples of Athena pilfering people’s trauma for her stories.

However, Kuang avoids villainizing any one person, which is how it goes in real life. June stole, Athena manipulated people, the people on Twitter bully and create conspiracy theories, there loads of comments about white people being shit — and here is where I felt myself getting huffy. When the Tweets said something along the lines of “white people are like that,” I was sucked into June’s thoughts. Citing research she did to edit Athena’s manuscript, June thinks, “Actually… just because Chinese people were being discriminated against doesn’t mean that they couldn’t be racist as well. And actually, it’s well documented that the Chinese laborers did not get along with Arabs and Moroccans — according to one of my sources, the Chinese would call them ‘black devils.’ Interethnic conflicts are a thing, you know.” Oh, man! I’m kind of mad at Kuang for messing with my feelings! I felt terrible when I sided with June. I felt terrible when June made excuses for her theft. I was all over the place emotionally, and I realized that’s something I value in a novel. When June explains an online attack that I identified with, I wasn’t sure if I was meant to feel ashamed or an affinity: “Someone says my past reviews on Goodreads are racist. (All I did was one write once that I couldn’t relate to an Indian writer’s romance novel, because all the characters were unlikable and way too obsessed with their family duties to the point of disbelief.)” I’ve had a similar experience with reading Indian novels, feeling tired of the harsh family trope, the mother calling the daughter fat, the father sitting around and waiting to be served.

As I read, I thought about a few years ago when I tried to read more #OwnVoices books, ones from authors who lived in the country about which they were writing. It was so complicated. I thought Jhumpa Lahiri was an Indian woman, but she identifies as British-American and now writes in Italian. And on it went. Do children of immigrants count as #OwnVoices when they write about their parents’ home country? As one character says in Yellowface, “…spoiled Bay Area kids who couldn’t even speak Mandarin and who thought that Asian identification boiled down to being annoyingly obsessed with bubble tea and BTS were diluting the radical force of the diaspora canon.” What does it mean to be part of any nationality, ethnic group, and/or race? Earlier this year I watched a horror movie called Death Name that explored Korean identity. The main character’s grandmother was from Korea, her parents were Korean, she was born in the United States. Upon arriving at college, the Korean student group wants her to join, but some members are put off because she can’t speak Korean. What does it mean to be Korean, then?

Although the complicated questions Kuang raises are the best part of her novel, the trajectory is so accurate that you’ll swear Yellowface was plucked from real life, especially the comments posted on Twitter. When one writer says that accusing June on Twitter of plagiarism is like stoking a lynch mob, that person becomes the focus: “There’s then a heated debate over whether it’s appropriate to use the words ‘lynch mob’ when describing a white woman [June], and it ends with dozens of people calling the above referenced author a racist. Said author’s [Twitter] account is locked within hours.” Have you guys seen this stuff play out on Twitter? I have. It’s embarrassing, in my opinion, how into the weeds we are on what subjects are permitted for writers. I can’t help but think there is a writer having awareness of his/her goals in choosing to write non-white characters and then there is censorship.

I think Yellowface is clever because I’m painfully aware that I’m reading a book by an Asian person woman writing from the perspective of a white woman who’s herself off as the author of a book written by an Asian woman. Readers will love Yellowface for its complexity and the way it holds a mirror to the Twitter mobs, Booktubers, and critics who try to control the publishing industry by getting authors canceled. If you’ve been in a creative writing program or went to an MFA program, Kuang’s book is a must read.

23 comments

  1. When I reviewed this novel (Sept. 26, 2023), I said I thought parts of it were already dated because of the demise of Twitter. Do you know people who still use it?

    Like

    • Honestly, I do not use Twitter myself. I know it turned into X. I know that when I was on it for a hot minute, people were constantly attacking authors. I thought it was ridiculous, and I couldn’t fathom sticking out my neck to share an unsolicited opinion in the name of …. what? Allyship? Concerns for what it looks like if you remain quiet? I have no idea. The only place I see Twitter now is in screenshots on various hilarious subReddits.

      Liked by 1 person

    • It was so close to reality that I got super involved reading this novel. Another person commented it feels a little dated because no one really uses Twitter anymore. I know it’s X now, but I do think authors are still throwing in their two cents all over the place, trying to take a moral stand, failing miserably, not really considering what they’re saying, curious over who gets to control a narrative of white vs. non-white people. It’s complicated and messy in the best way possible that will make you re-think publishing and publicity.

      Like

  2. Really enjoyed your review! I read Babel back when that came out and liked it well enough but felt it was too long and baggy in places. Then I read Katabasis, her newest one last year and found it disappointing and waaaayyy too long. I’ve heard good things about Yellowface, but after the Katabasis I thought, wow, I’m just not going to read any other of her books. But now I might need to make an exception for this one if I can get past my meh feelings for the ones I have read.

    Like

    • I’ve heard that Babel and Katabasis are “academic” and even have footnotes. Yellowface reads like a typical novel and not a college textbook, but it doesn’t skimp on making you think really hard about things. One thing that bothered me is Kuang said she doesn’t know how to say “Katabasis,” a Greek word, and she was very “meh” about people getting it right. I feel like she’s calling back to Yellowface and what she’s exploring when it comes to people from different cultures writing about each other.

      Like

      • They are “dark academia” stories. Babel takes place at a university and Katabasis is two university students who go to the underworld to bring back their dissertation advisor who died in a accident. I hadn’t heard that Kuang didn’t know how to say “katabasis.” You’d think it would matter for the author to be able to correctly pronounce the title of their own book.

        Like

  3. First of all, I’d never seen that Colleen Hoover thing. WOW.

    Second, I don’t know how I feel about this book. I couldn’t give it a star rating. Which I guess means I didn’t really like it that much. But I think I can appreciate what she’s trying to do. It just left me feeling… cold. and confused. Which maybe is the point?

    Like

    • My mom was very angry that the book did not give us answers. Can a white person write a Chinese historical fiction? Can a Chinese-American write about Koreans? etc. It’s a hard question and at the end of the day, there is no answer — that’s the answer. It’s all subjective, and if you can live with yourself and feel you did you best while avoiding the internet, you can do whatever you want with your stories.

      I’ve never read Colleen Hoover, but that must have cropped up in my Reddit perusal at just the right time for my review and I felt it fit!

      Liked by 1 person

  4. I’ve wanted to read this book, mainly because it sounded like a cheeky look at the publishing industry and author life in general, but I appreciate now how nuanced the plot is, and all the feelings it would bring up for the reader. Thoughtful review!

    Like

  5. I enjoyed this one too and it raises so many good and complicated questions! Kuang is excellent at throwing in things that muddy the waters so that we’re never sure whose side we should be on.

    Like

  6. Really enjoyed your review. I didn’t expect to enjoy Yellowface as much as I did (usually I find hyped contemporary novels very disappointing). There was so much to think about in this book.

    Like

Leave a reply to kimbofo Cancel reply