Mice 1961 by Stacey Levine

Stacey Levine’s newest novel, Mice 1961, is another intriguing gallivant through a small community. I’ve come to think of this as Levine’s trademark style. She writes of a group big enough that you cannot remember each person in detail, nor does she seem to want you to. In fact, one character is The Artist with the Scarf. Yet, the group is limited in that we do not traverse into the wider world — a different community, a neighboring city, the nation at large.

Once she has her players set up, Levine puts them in high-emotion, low-stakes conflict. As everyone gathers for a community potluck, they harangue a young woman for her discovery: she had some blue fruit, she cooked it, she put that into water, and now her dish to pass is blue drink. Except the group demeans her — it’s not even juice! — until they’re claiming she brought water in a pail. The group’s bizarre dynamic cleverly leaves you laughing yet curious about their accusatory dispositions. It is this potluck day around which the novel centers.

The narrator is Girtle, a young, homeless woman who has come to live with Jody and Mice. Even her living situation is absurd: “Did either one of them ever check behind the couch to look at me as I looked at them? Did they even once remember that I was staying there?” Girtle spends the story hiding out behind trees and bushes, corners and furniture, narrating what she overhears without interacting much herself. She’s is tasked by Jody (the older sister) to keep an eye on Mice. At times, I wondered at the choice of narrator, but she mimics the skittishness of her charge, as if Mice is narrating and watching herself. The point of view is unique, sometimes impossible.

Both women are young adults, out of school. They’re well-known in the community due to their abnormalities: “So the story of the half-blind colorless girl with the now-dead mother, an angry, impulsive, unknowable sister, and a blank of a vanished father spread to the most distant neighborhoods, since that is what words and stories do.” Levine never uses the word “albino,” but the description of Mice fits the label. For her differences, Mice is taunted by high school children and dismissed by adults, so she spends a good deal on the page scurrying around and hiding in unreachable nooks.

I wouldn’t say Mice 1961 is about a “poor, defenseless” woman with a disability. In fact, all characters are raked over the coals for the strangest reasons, highlighting the way communities are judging all its members for suspicious behavior. Here is an example: “The truth is Sherrie you and your sister’re so young and pale that neither of you understands what it means to have eyebrows!” What does that even mean? And does it matter that it means little on the surface? If you note the year in the title, you realize Levine has set her novel during the Cold War hysteria, possibly the reason all characters are suspect. While Levine doesn’t go in depth on the subject, she makes reference so you don’t forget:

“I mean as a young person . . . well what d’you think of the world situation?” [asked Moates].
Honey laughed. “What do I think . . . what? The whole world? She shook her head, wrinkled her nose at the two men.
Remnick pitched in, “You see Larry and I’ve been talking about the A-bomb. How it could be the start of humanity’s end. Or will we step up as a species and learn to get along?”

Very little of the novel is directly about Mice or Girtle or Jody, but instead highlights the absurdity of life and turns the dial to eleven. I was reminded of We Have Always Lived in the Castle by Shirley Jackson and Carmen Dog by Carol Emshwiller, and even a touch of “The Monsters are Due on Maple Street” (a 1960 episode of The Twilight Zone). Still, Levine has a style all her own. When I start a new Levine novel, I think, “Yep, that’s her.”

Compared to Levine’s previous novel Frances Johnson, her newest novel feels a little long. It can be challenging to dip in and out of because once you’re into this askew community, everything around you goes away. To put the book down and come back to it later, it’s like you need a moment to get on Mr. Rogers’s train into the World of Make Believe and ride into a new place.

Thank you to Stacey Levine for reaching out to me, and to Verse Chorus Press for sending me a reviewer’s copy.

14 comments

  1. “Oh Jody — mayn’t I stay longer? I’ll wash the chairs’ legs I promise. That will save you money.”

    What the heck? How does washing chair legs save money?

    The characters all sound quirky/odd/interesting. Is there a plot of a sort or is it all about the character interactions?

    Like

    • I think that’s the point; washing chair legs has nothing to do with money, so it’s both absurd but a genuine plea. There isn’t a plot so much as these bizarre interactions in which people size each other up to see how normal they are, who is abnormal, who is useful, etc. Well, the main plot point is to get Mice to a party on time; I get Mrs. Dalloway vibes just reading that sentence.

      Liked by 2 people

  2. Hmm this definitely sounds odd. Situations like these where the characters are all sniping at each other and accusing one another of things makes me uncomfortable to read about, because I just hate bullying, and it feels so damaging. Mind you, 1961, it’s a time I can’t even relate to or fathom!

    Like

  3. This sounds interesting, although perhaps not quite my type- perhaps a little more on the whimsical side of weird than I prefer, by the time the comments between characters verge into the nonsensical. I’m not a person who prefers much humor/silliness when reading so I need to feel that there’s another point being made even in a wacky eyebrow remark lol (is the speaker getting at the fact that pale people often have pale/invisible eyebrows?? But does having bolder brows “mean” something to begin with?? I have no idea!)

    Like

    • Ha, I have no idea either, which makes me sit there and think about it all the more. The way eyebrows are important in women’s fashion throughout history astounds me, even though I had this impression that it was newly important with the onset of those eyebrows that look like they were drawn on with a thick sharpie.

      Liked by 1 person

  4. Sounds weird but compelling, but what do you mean by “The point of view is unique, sometimes impossible.” The “impossible” bit I mean. I guess, I mean, impossible in what way?

    Like

    • If the narrator is hiding behind a bush, she’s listening to everyone at the party. Or, she’s crouching around the corner. I suppose it’s technically possible, but not the kind of position you often find a narrator in. At times, I thought there were conversations taking place indoors and outdoors, and the narrator will hear all of it.

      Like

    • I would says it’s just as coherent as Jackson’s work, but leans more toward people doing things in chronological order, like We Have Always Lived in the Castle, as opposed to The Haunting of Hill House, which is pretty confusing at times.

      Liked by 1 person

    • I feel like Levine puts people into normal situations (go to a party) and then make them all exaggerated to some degree (almost like a Nancy Drew or Sweet Valley book–no one seems really real) and then adds in some absurdity (offering to wash the chair legs to earn one’s keep).

      Liked by 1 person

Insert 2 Cents Here: